Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Serengeti Kings

NetEnt

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
4,900×
Reels
5
Theme signals
Not published
VS

Fate's Fortune

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
5,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Striking Hot 5

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.29%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
5,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Serengeti Kings vs Fate's Fortune

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,900× and 5,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Serengeti Kings does not publish a rating.

Serengeti Kings vs Striking Hot 5

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.29% — Striking Hot 5 is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,900× and 5,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Serengeti Kings does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)