Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Space Wars 2™ Powerpoints™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Kung Pao Panda
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.15%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.15% — Kung Pao Panda is 0.05 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 10,000× against 15,000×, with Kung Pao Panda higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Space Wars 2™ Powerpoints™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
