Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Space Wars 2™ Powerpoints™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Candy Jar Clusters
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.10% against 96.08%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Space Wars 2™ Powerpoints™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Space Wars 2™ Powerpoints™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Candy Jar Clusters reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
