Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Space Wars™ Megaways™ XXXtreme
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.16%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 14,400×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Sails of Riches
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.16% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 14,400× against 10,000×, with Space Wars™ Megaways™ XXXtreme higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Space Wars™ Megaways™ XXXtreme does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sails of Riches returns more in theory over the long run, while Space Wars™ Megaways™ XXXtreme reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
