Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Spice
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ancient Treasure: Poseidon
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 18,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Adventure
VS
Loner
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 14,999×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Spice vs Ancient Treasure: Poseidon
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.09% against 96.10%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 15,000× against 18,000×, with Ancient Treasure: Poseidon higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Spice does not publish a rating.
Spice vs Loner
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.09% against 96.06%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15,000× and 14,999×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Spice does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
