Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Spinsane™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.26%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Striking Hot 5
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Battle The Beast
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,047×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Spinsane™ vs Striking Hot 5
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.26% against 96.29%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Spinsane™ does not publish a rating.
Spinsane™ vs Battle The Beast
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Battle The Beast does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 5,000× against 4,047×, with Spinsane™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Spinsane™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
