Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Truth does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Starburst Galaxy™ does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.20% — Moon Princess Stargazing is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 17,288× against 10,000×, with Starburst Galaxy™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Starburst Galaxy™ does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Moon Princess Stargazing returns more in theory over the long run, while Starburst Galaxy™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Add to the comparison (up to four)