Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Steam Tower™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 97.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jolly Roger
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 97.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 928×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Hotline™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 97.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Steam Tower™ vs Jolly Roger
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 97.04% against 97.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 928×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Steam Tower™ does not publish a rating.
Steam Tower™ vs Hotline™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 97.04% against 97.04%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,000× against 1,200×, with Hotline™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Steam Tower™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
