Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Strolling Staxx: Cubic Fruits™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.98%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,400×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Ding Dong Christmas Bells
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 2,100×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.98% against 96.05% — Ding Dong Christmas Bells is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 1,400× against 2,100×, with Ding Dong Christmas Bells higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Strolling Staxx: Cubic Fruits™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
