Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Super Striker™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.93%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,700×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Disco Danny
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,700×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Music & party
VS
Horse's Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Super Striker™ vs Disco Danny
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.93% against 96.04% — Super Striker™ is 0.89 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,700× and 1,700×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Super Striker™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Super Striker™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Disco Danny reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Super Striker™ vs Horse's Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Horse's Treasures does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Super Striker™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
