Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Superstars™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Star Joker
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Truth
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Superstars™ vs Star Joker
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.25% — Star Joker is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 4,500× against 5,000×, with Star Joker higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Superstars™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Superstars™ vs Truth
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Truth does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Superstars™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
