Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Legend of Shangri-La: Cluster Pays™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.59%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 800×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Snow Party
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Music & party
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.59% against 96.50% — The Legend of Shangri-La: Cluster Pays™ is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 6.3×: 800× against 5,000×, with Snow Party higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: The Legend of Shangri-La: Cluster Pays™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Legend of Shangri-La: Cluster Pays™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Snow Party reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
