Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Wish Master™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.64%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cloud Quest
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.64%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Galaxy Babies
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,575×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
The Wish Master™ vs Cloud Quest
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.64% against 96.64%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 2,200× against 2,500×, with Cloud Quest higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: The Wish Master™ does not publish a rating.
The Wish Master™ vs Galaxy Babies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Galaxy Babies does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 2,200× against 1,575×, with The Wish Master™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: The Wish Master™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
