Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Trollpot 5000™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ruff Heist
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Leprechaun Joy
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,255×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Trollpot 5000™ vs Ruff Heist
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.19% against 96.19%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,200× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Trollpot 5000™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ruff Heist returns more in theory over the long run, while Trollpot 5000™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Trollpot 5000™ vs Leprechaun Joy
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.19% against 96.19%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,200× and 5,255×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Trollpot 5000™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
