Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild-O-Tron 3000™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Doom of Egypt
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.01% against 96.21% — Doom of Egypt is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wild-O-Tron 3000™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
