Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Play’n GO

Microgaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.36% against 96.38%.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 2,200× against 2,500×, with Inferno Joker higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Wild Water™ does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.19% — Wild Water™ is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 2,200× against 2,000×, with Wild Water™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Wild Water™ does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)