Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Water™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.36%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Queen of Gods
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.38%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,031×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wolf Cub™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.34%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,100×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wild Water™ vs Queen of Gods
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.36% against 96.38%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,200× and 2,031×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wild Water™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Queen of Gods returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Water™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Wild Water™ vs Wolf Cub™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.36% against 96.34%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,200× and 2,100×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wild Water™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
