Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wilderland™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.16%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Super Flip Deluxe
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wild Bazaar™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.15%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wilderland™ vs Super Flip Deluxe
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.16% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 800× against 1,200×, with Super Flip Deluxe higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wilderland™ does not publish a rating.
Wilderland™ vs Wild Bazaar™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.16% against 96.15%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 800× and 800×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wilderland™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wilderland™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Bazaar™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
