Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wonders of Christmas™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 19,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Fat Panda
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Battleship Strike
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 13,272×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wonders of Christmas™ vs Fat Panda
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.06% against 96.07%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 19,000× and 20,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wonders of Christmas™ does not publish a rating.
Wonders of Christmas™ vs Battleship Strike
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Battleship Strike does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 19,000× against 13,272×, with Wonders of Christmas™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wonders of Christmas™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
