Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Nolimit City

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.03% against 96.25% — Dr. Toonz is 0.22 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 20,000× against 22,000×, with Dr. Toonz higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Apocalypse Super xNudge® does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.02%.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 20,000× against 10,000×, with Apocalypse Super xNudge® higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Apocalypse Super xNudge® does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)