Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Bounty Hunters
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 52,310×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wild west
VS
Captain’s Bounty
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.15%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wild west
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.15% — Captain’s Bounty is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 52,310× against 30,000×, with Bounty Hunters higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Bounty Hunters does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Captain’s Bounty returns more in theory over the long run, while Bounty Hunters reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Wild west.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
