Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
D-Day
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.12%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 55,555×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
The Great Icescape
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.33%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.12% against 96.33% — The Great Icescape is 0.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 55,555× against 50,000×, with D-Day higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: D-Day does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Great Icescape returns more in theory over the long run, while D-Day reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
