Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Das xBoot
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 55,200×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Infectious 5 xWays®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 55,555×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Das xBoot vs Infectious 5 xWays®
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.02%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 55,200× and 55,555×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Das xBoot does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Das xBoot returns more in theory over the long run, while Infectious 5 xWays® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Das xBoot vs Pocket Ace
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.03%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Das xBoot does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




