Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Das xBoot

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.03%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
55,200×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Infectious 5 xWays®

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.02%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
55,555×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Pocket Ace

Microgaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.03%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Das xBoot vs Infectious 5 xWays®

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.02%.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 55,200× and 55,555×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Das xBoot does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Das xBoot returns more in theory over the long run, while Infectious 5 xWays® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Das xBoot vs Pocket Ace

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.03%.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Das xBoot does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)