Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
El Paso Gunfight xNudge®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 44,440×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Captain’s Bounty
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.15%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wild west
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.15% — Captain’s Bounty is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 44,440× against 30,000×, with El Paso Gunfight xNudge® higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: El Paso Gunfight xNudge® does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Captain’s Bounty returns more in theory over the long run, while El Paso Gunfight xNudge® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
