Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fire in the Hole 3
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 70,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rise of Olympus 1000
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.24%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 60,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.24% — Rise of Olympus 1000 is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 70,000× against 60,000×, with Fire in the Hole 3 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fire in the Hole 3 does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rise of Olympus 1000 returns more in theory over the long run, while Fire in the Hole 3 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
