Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Gluttony
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 32,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Evil Goblins xBomb®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 31,969×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Lucky Apple x1000
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Gluttony vs Evil Goblins xBomb®
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.09% against 96.14%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 32,000× and 31,969×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gluttony does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Evil Goblins xBomb® returns more in theory over the long run, while Gluttony reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Gluttony vs Lucky Apple x1000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gluttony does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)


