Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Golden Shower
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 19,999×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Golden Genie And The Walking Wilds
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 9,583×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Mermaid Riches
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Golden Shower vs Golden Genie And The Walking Wilds
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.03%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 19,999× against 9,583×, with Golden Shower higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Golden Shower does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Golden Shower vs Mermaid Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.71% — Mermaid Riches is 0.67 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 19,999× and 20,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Golden Shower does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
