Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Hot Nudge
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,413×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Cruise Royale
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.65%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Lucky Apple x1000
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Hot Nudge vs Cruise Royale
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.65% — Cruise Royale is 0.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,413× and 2,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Hot Nudge does not publish a rating.
Hot Nudge vs Lucky Apple x1000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Hot Nudge does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



