Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Immortal Fruits
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,787×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Dandy Diamonds
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Fruits
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,910×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Immortal Fruits vs Dandy Diamonds
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Dandy Diamonds does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Immortal Fruits does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Immortal Fruits vs Fruits
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.06% against 96.23% — Fruits is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,787× and 2,910×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Immortal Fruits does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
