Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Nolimit City

Nolimit City

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.06% against 96.23% — Fruits is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,787× and 2,910×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Immortal Fruits does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.06% against 96.75% — Fruity Candy is 0.69 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 3.6×: 2,787× against 10,000×, with Fruity Candy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Immortal Fruits does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Add to the comparison (up to four)