Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Infectious 5 xWays®

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.02%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
55,555×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Das xBoot

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.03%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
55,200×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

African Quest

Microgaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.02%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Adventure
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Infectious 5 xWays® vs Das xBoot

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.02% against 96.03%.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 55,555× and 55,200×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Infectious 5 xWays® does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Das xBoot returns more in theory over the long run, while Infectious 5 xWays® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Infectious 5 xWays® vs African Quest

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.02% against 96.02%.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Infectious 5 xWays® does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)