Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Nolimit City

Play’n GO

Hacksaw Gaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.10% against 96.12%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 12,250× against 10,240×, with Jingle Balls higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Jingle Balls does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Win-A-Beest returns more in theory over the long run, while Jingle Balls reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.39% — Supreme Zeus is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 12,250× and 12,500×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Jingle Balls does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)