Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Karen Maneater
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,757×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Outsourced 2 - Balkan Engineering
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,111×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Karen Maneater vs Outsourced 2 - Balkan Engineering
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 96.04%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 11,757× and 11,111×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Karen Maneater does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Outsourced 2 - Balkan Engineering returns more in theory over the long run, while Karen Maneater reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Karen Maneater vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Karen Maneater does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
