Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Karen Maneater

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.00%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
11,757×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

3 Dancing Monkeys

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.00%
Volatility
High
Win cap
12,077×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals
Free demo available →
VS

Supreme Zeus

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.39%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
12,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Greek myth

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Karen Maneater vs 3 Dancing Monkeys

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 96.00%.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 11,757× and 12,077×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Karen Maneater does not publish a rating.

Karen Maneater vs Supreme Zeus

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.39% — Supreme Zeus is 0.39 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 11,757× and 12,500×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Karen Maneater does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)