Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Milky Ways
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,664×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Piggy Gold
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 95.86%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
VS
Harlequin Carnival
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,861×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Milky Ways vs Piggy Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.14% against 95.86% — Milky Ways is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 5,664× against 5,000×, with Milky Ways higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Milky Ways does not publish a rating.
Milky Ways vs Harlequin Carnival
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.14% against 96.14%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,664× and 5,861×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Milky Ways does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
