Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Outsourced
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Wild Blood 2
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.18%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Outsourced vs Wild Blood 2
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.18% — Wild Blood 2 is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
Outsourced vs Supreme Zeus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.39% — Supreme Zeus is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 5,000× against 12,500×, with Supreme Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




