Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pearl Harbor
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 41,127×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wrath of Seth - Split
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 21,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Egypt, Greek myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.21% against 96.25%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 41,127× against 21,000×, with Pearl Harbor higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pearl Harbor does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wrath of Seth - Split returns more in theory over the long run, while Pearl Harbor reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
