Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pearl Harbor
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 41,127×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
The Border
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 44,288×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.21% against 96.17%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 41,127× and 44,288×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pearl Harbor does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Pearl Harbor returns more in theory over the long run, while The Border reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
