Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pearl Harbor
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 41,127×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Candy Jar Clusters
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.21% against 96.08% — Pearl Harbor is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 4.1×: 41,127× against 10,000×, with Pearl Harbor higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pearl Harbor does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
