Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Nolimit City

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.21% against 96.08% — Pearl Harbor is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 4.1×: 41,127× against 10,000×, with Pearl Harbor higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Pearl Harbor does not publish a rating.

Different format families: Pearl Harbor is Cluster pays, Shark Feast is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.21% against 96.20%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 41,127× and 40,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Pearl Harbor does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)