Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pixies vs Pirates
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 95.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,907×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Karen Maneater
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,757×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Pixies vs Pirates vs Karen Maneater
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 95.91% against 96.00% — Karen Maneater is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 11,907× and 11,757×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pixies vs Pirates does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Karen Maneater returns more in theory over the long run, while Pixies vs Pirates reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Pixies vs Pirates vs Supreme Zeus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.91% against 96.39% — Supreme Zeus is 0.48 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 11,907× and 12,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pixies vs Pirates does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
