Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pixies vs Pirates
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 95.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,907×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Treasures of Kongar
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.91% against 96.20% — Treasures of Kongar is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 11,907× against 15,000×, with Treasures of Kongar higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pixies vs Pirates does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
