Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
San Quentin xWays®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 150,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Buffalo King
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 93,750×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Guardians of Ice & Fire
PG Soft
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
San Quentin xWays® vs Buffalo King
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.06%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.6×: 150,000× against 93,750×, with San Quentin xWays® higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: San Quentin xWays® does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Buffalo King returns more in theory over the long run, while San Quentin xWays® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
San Quentin xWays® vs Guardians of Ice & Fire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.03% against 96.70% — Guardians of Ice & Fire is 0.67 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.0×: 150,000× against 50,000×, with San Quentin xWays® higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: San Quentin xWays® does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Guardians of Ice & Fire returns more in theory over the long run, while San Quentin xWays® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
