Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
San Quentin 2: Death Row
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 200,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Buffalo King
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 93,750×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.13% against 96.06% — San Quentin 2: Death Row is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 200,000× against 93,750×, with San Quentin 2: Death Row higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: San Quentin 2: Death Row does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
