Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Soaked By Seamen
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ancient Treasure: Poseidon
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 18,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.10% — Ancient Treasure: Poseidon is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 30,000× against 18,000×, with Soaked By Seamen higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Soaked By Seamen does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ancient Treasure: Poseidon returns more in theory over the long run, while Soaked By Seamen reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
