Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tanked
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
The Shimmering Woods
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
The Cage
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Tanked vs The Shimmering Woods
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.20% — The Shimmering Woods is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 25,000× and 25,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Tanked does not publish a rating.
Tanked vs The Cage
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.05%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 25,000× and 25,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Tanked does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
