Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Thor Hammer Time
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,328×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS

Hot 4 Cash
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,154×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS

Lucky Apple x1000
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Thor Hammer Time vs Hot 4 Cash
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.05%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,328× and 2,154×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hot 4 Cash returns more in theory over the long run, while Thor Hammer Time reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Thor Hammer Time vs Lucky Apple x1000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)


