Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Thor Hammer Time
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,328×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Asgardian Rising
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS

Primal Rampage
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Thor Hammer Time vs Asgardian Rising
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Asgardian Rising does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Thor Hammer Time vs Primal Rampage
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.03% against 96.20% — Primal Rampage is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,328× and 2,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



