Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Nolimit City

PG Soft

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Treasures of Aztec does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Tombstone does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Adventure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.19% against 96.20%.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 11,456× against 10,000×, with Tombstone higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Tombstone does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Reactoonz 100 returns more in theory over the long run, while Tombstone reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)