Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Ugliest Catch

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.11%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
50,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals
Free demo available →
VS

Piggy Heist

Play’n GO

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.25%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
70,000×
Reels
6
Theme signals
Animals
Free demo available →
VS

3x Catch

Booongo

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals, Wealth
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Ugliest Catch vs Piggy Heist

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.11% against 96.25% — Piggy Heist is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 50,000× against 70,000×, with Piggy Heist higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Ugliest Catch does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: Animals.

Ugliest Catch vs 3x Catch

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Ugliest Catch does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)